.

Ο λόγος στασίμων 1:1 ενός κεραιοσυστήματος, δεν συνεπάγεται τον 1:1 λόγο μεταφοράς ισχύος, προς την κεραία!
Showing posts with label double bazooka. Show all posts
Showing posts with label double bazooka. Show all posts

Wednesday, 20 April 2022

OPINIONS SOUGHT ON DOUBLE BAZOOKA ANTENNA:

Ερώτηση για την απόδοση της  Double Bazooka.
Απάντηση με κακά μαντάτα.

...I am researching the Double Bazooka as another antenna I would like to experiment with on 20/40 meters. I'd like to hear from anyone who has used this antenna in the past.....is it more than just a glorified dipole or inverted V ? Has anyone tried building it with 75 ohm coax (I have quite a bit of this left over from my cable TV days).
If It somehow achieves performance that can not be realized with an ordinary Inverted V, I may give it a shot.
Thank You. Rod, K5FRH...

Charles Tom Rauch
This antenna has been analyzed and tested many times over my radio lifetime.
I once owned Midport Electronics and one of my employees sold them at Hamfests using unrealistic claims. I had BC field strength meters, because I did some SW and AM station antenna proofs.
I took one to my house and set it up in the clear and made all sorts of measurements. (I can't recall if it was actually one of his, or one I made. That was like around 1970 or so.)
It was ever so slightly lossier than a dipole, no quieter for noise, and actually not any noticeable amount wider BW than a regular old dipole made from the same materials. He continued to justify selling them, saying "people report they are better so I'll keep selling them" or something like that.
I tested another on for someone from IAC years later. It measured exactly the same as earlier tests, within instrument and site tolerances.
Walter Maxwell in "Reflections" does a pretty good analysis, as has other over the years. His theoretical conclusions paralleled the measurements I made some years earlier (around 1970 or so).

https://www.facebook.com/groups/antennabuilding/permalink/3479615402272284